X-Received: by 10.66.88.129 with SMTP id bg1mr7563169pab.46.1357032396322; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 01:26:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.154.132 with SMTP id vo4mr13734792igb.7.1357032396258; Tue, 01 Jan 2013 01:26:36 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!169.228.66.3.MISMATCH!ihnp4.UCSD.Edu!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!f6no3479895pbd.1!news-out.google.com!s9ni70930pbb.0!nntp.google.com!kr7no12178586pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 01:26:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.164.137.214; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.164.137.214 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NoClassDefFoundError From: Lew Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 09:26:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20849 emf wrote: > After a long time, I tried to create an applet. In eclipse it runs > perfect as an applet, but in the webpage in the browser it gives a > NoClassDefFoundError. emf, in case I actually did hurt your feelings as "lipska the cat" and perhaps others think I might, I apologize. It isn't about your feelings. It's about the information and way you should proceed to succeed. If you want to be a good programmer, you have to be able to figure things out. You will note that the link sends you right to the first piece of relevant information about your problem, and the only one we can assist with given the paucity of information you have provided. The "you did read that before, yes?" is two things - a strong hint that you should have already if you didn't, and an acknowledgment that it's elementary advice if you did. Either way, it shouldn't hurt your feelings. it's an objective question. You did read it before, yes? If not, you should have, and should develop the RTFM habit. It's objective. If so, then the question simply is to confirm the equally objective data. Also, your questions asked for exactly the information given. If you need different data, you need different questions. This was also indicated in the two answers you got. We also asked for specific missing items. If you examine the two answers, you will note a density of useful facts, useful questions, and advice for how to deal with the problem. You would be wise to follow up on the facts, answer our questions (here, publicly), and heed the advice. But not blindly. Just heed the good advice. -- Lew