Received: by 10.66.83.35 with SMTP id n3mr3270911pay.23.1350330003982; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.138.195 with SMTP id qs3mr2759083pbb.11.1350330003940; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:40:03 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!kt20no35744782pbb.1!news-out.google.com!jt13ni6326pbb.1!nntp.google.com!kr7no30695391pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:40:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9ac3b7f9-5751-410f-bac3-50703b976b6d@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.29 References: <3a63483c-4322-4bfb-8c28-2d528bf48443@googlegroups.com> <9ac3b7f9-5751-410f-bac3-50703b976b6d@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Operation in String to Double conversion From: Lew Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:40:03 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:19376 frank...@gmail.com wrote: You forgot to attribute your citation. markspace wrote: >> I don't think I much care for that site you link too. Too many spelling >> mistakes ("i" and "java") for me to take it seriously. > > wow, sorry for not complying with your orthographical requirements, although imho that's hardly > grounds to disregard the library. On the contrary, it's a really reliable bellwether of product quality. Those who are careless when you're dating are unlikely to be courteous when you're married. If you cannot even promote a product with professionalism and attention to detail, it is very unlikely the product will reflect a higher standard. > maybe this site is more to your liking: > > http://www.objecthunter.net/exp4j/ > > although there are probably some typos in there too ;) > > the lib may not be perfect, and i'm [sic] sure there are things that can be done to optimize the > implementation, changes i'd [sic] be happy to adapt. so take a look at the github project and drop me > a line if you have some constructive criticism regarding the implementation. He already gave you constructive criticism and you acted like a jerk about it. Why would anyone waste any more time on it? -- Lew