Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Robert Klemme Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Efficiency/Reliablility of Scaled Up JTable Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:39:29 +0200 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net xBltVABk05S7gFZ/SGJUmwtg5v1YBSt7QE7c9wHDu1KL8f70I= Cancel-Lock: sha1:ynh7JA9LWaV66G05MFexXc2hZyc= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:23719 On 04/29/2013 02:13 PM, clusardi2k@aol.com wrote: > If I have a JTable with a lot of colors, and if the application > deletes and then adds columns to it will the performance degrade if I > go from a 30 X 30 table to a 1000 X 100 table, please explain. I suggest to measure instead of speculate where the time is spent. There are even free tools to do that (e.g. -Xrunhprof and HP JMeter). Cheers robert