Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Robert Klemme Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: [OT] Re: polling IRQs in a thread's code Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:07:41 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net kSEGdkgxOZyluvO691HFMAhPkQizi3nVsjywEygcUQ9Pc3MTc= Cancel-Lock: sha1:sxeFuJ0mq1r9tSnsuR5hgvf08d4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130325-2, 25.03.2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:23125 On 26.03.2013 08:03, Robert Klemme wrote: > On 26.03.2013 00:58, Eric Sosman wrote: >> On 3/25/2013 6:15 PM, Robert Klemme wrote: >>> [...] >>> That can also be viewed as a downside: you loose control over when the >>> process may be interrupted.[...] >> >> Elsethread I wrote >> >> > Coming attractions: "loose" and "lose" ;-) > > LOOL Without wanting to reduce my part in this I believe there is a certain chance that pure reading of your "announcement" primed my mind to sneak in tooo many o's... *chuckle* Cheers robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/