Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: FastCat 'performance'
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 21:00:05 +0100
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <ap76u5Fch8nU1@mid.dfncis.de>
References: <qa8pi8tgm6kpbcn19l69rfvbclio6spivt@4ax.com> <ap5aalFrj3dU1@mid.dfncis.de> <voqpdc2ltdvq$.yl7an5lgvzea.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.dfncis.de FqTsMsdMzTSMO4hAFpHtpQO/7xKrk3ZiPksI9ciS0GSww63eLqDC2k2+z8Cfu1
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130222 Thunderbird/17.0.3
In-Reply-To: <voqpdc2ltdvq$.yl7an5lgvzea.dlg@40tude.net>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:22588

Hi Joerg,

Am 27.02.2013 18:16, schrieb Joerg Meier:
> Because his incessant advertising irritates me, I spent a few minutes
> writing a small benchmark, comparing the performance of StringBuilder,
> StringBuffer and FastCat. The results were ... well, pretty much what one
> would expect:
> 
> Took 00:08.845ms to append 454,895,082 chars total with FastCat.
> Took 00:03.939ms to append 454,895,082 chars total with StringBuffer.
> Took 00:03.462ms to append 454,895,082 chars total with StringBuilder.

Thanks for that!


Regards,
  Sven