Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10650
| From | Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question |
| Date | 2011-12-10 19:53 +0000 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112101945500.25348@urchin.earth.li> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <4edffd56$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <mBTDq.11783$cG.7766@newsfe14.iad> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112081541440.15036@urchin.earth.li> <SMlEq.17211$JE1.11242@newsfe21.iad> <slrnje411o.fvg.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > I can imagine managers to be more afraid of longer sync-intervals, > resulting from the DVCS-philosophy, than of not seeing all devels' > interims work. The DVCS philosophy does not result in longer intervals between sharing work with your colleagues (what i assume you mean by "sync-intervals"). Both centralised and distributed VCS makes it easy to share work with your colleagues. You can do it as often or as seldom as you choose, or your process dictates. The choice of centralised or distributed VCS has *no* bearing on it. I have come across this belief before. I honestly don't know where people get it from. >> Sooner or later I'll succeed in getting a client organization >> interested, and interested for the right reasons. But it hasn't >> happened yet. > > It would have to be a client whose devels are working remote, and where > the benefits of piling up some work before a sync outweighs the higher > risk of conflicts happening. No, as i explained, DVCS has benefits even in a conventionally-organised team. >> 1. History is super-important in these organizations. It is how you >> locate scapegoats. > > I do understand this motivation. The "scapegoat" is typically the one > who is in the best position to fix a problem, so identifying him without > having to ask everyone is worth as much time as by what the scapegoat > will be able to fix it more efficiently than anyone else on the project. DVCS is capable of recording history just as precisely as centralised VCS. Indeed, because you can have multiple local commits in between pushes, it can record *more* details about history. DVCSs also give you tools to erase and rewrite history, but it is your choice whether you use them or not. If you care about history, don't use them. tom -- Work alone does not suffice: the efforts must be intelligent. -- Charles B. Rogers
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two More Very General Consulting Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-11-30 21:00 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-11-30 21:45 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-11-30 23:00 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-01 03:06 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Novice <novice@example..com> - 2011-12-06 15:24 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-06 20:59 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-07 05:45 -0800
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-07 18:58 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-07 18:57 -0500
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-07 20:33 -0400
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-08 16:04 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-09 06:53 -0400
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-09 12:51 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2011-12-09 17:26 +0100
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-12-09 23:12 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-10 12:00 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-10 19:53 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-11 00:04 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-10 20:12 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-12-12 03:05 -0700
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-12 06:39 -0400
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-12-07 20:55 -0600
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-09 10:42 +0000
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-07 18:48 -0500
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-07 05:43 -0800
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 20:15 -0500
Re: Two More Very General Consulting Question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-06 16:45 -0800
csiph-web