Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven_K=F6hler?= <remove-sven.koehler@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: JMS vs Sockets -- bandwidth, size, speed, etc.
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:47:38 +0100
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <ak3jc6Fe0cnU1@mid.dfncis.de>
References: <94fcfac6-eff5-4e84-956a-8a7970867867@googlegroups.com> <50db8fbd$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ak30h8F9p52U1@mid.dfncis.de> <50dc910b$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.dfncis.de MfOToGZOpN+Me3OwCI5Zfwv9gwatI95/rPEosV//4ky40OEvL9LgXrCuE68W6BtHdTNYT29q3w
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YircX5SrZKyjf1V7cZ5drXZZ+cI=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <50dc910b$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20733

Am 27.12.2012 19:18, schrieb Arne Vajhøj:
> On 12/27/2012 8:26 AM, Sven Köhler wrote:
> 
>> A fourth option is to use object serialization without RMI, i.e.
>> ObjectOutputStream and ObjectInputStream. It is worth it, if your
>> protocol allows you to send multiple objects (or messages for that
>> matter) without having to wait for a reply.
> 
> I am not sure that I would count that as a distinct option.
> 
> The socket option will need something on top of it.

I see your point.
Maybe, I just met too many people overlooking that option.