Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!z28g2000pro.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: whl <wanghailunmail@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: A freshman's question
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <abd9cdc3-bae3-44b5-aa34-7bca01a76981@z28g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
References: <3242b80f-ee51-45f0-9e12-231482f61a97@r2g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <1dhv97lae1vhgj95pmo0pd8btte7ca3tus@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.30.49.103
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1319108142 25777 127.0.0.1 (20 Oct 2011 10:55:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:55:42 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z28g2000pro.googlegroups.com; posting-host=210.30.49.103; posting-account=HTLLjQoAAACz0TvVcFSbbOMA5uM_lEjQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HNKRUAELSC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/13.0.782.218 Safari/535.1,gzip(gfe)
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:9021

On 10=D4=C220=C8=D5, =CF=C2=CE=E72=CA=B156=B7=D6, Roedy Green <see_webs...@=
mindprod.com.invalid>
wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 20:08:05 -0700 (PDT), whl
> <wanghailunm...@gmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone
> who said :
>
> > I don't kown the
> >statement i=3Di++ operation sequence.
>
> This sort of code is not found in real code. It pushes the edges of
> the definition of the language. =20
>
> You would see
> i++
> or
> i+=3D2
> --
> Roedy Green Canadian Mind Productshttp://mindprod.com
> It should not be considered an error when the user starts something
> already started or stops something already stopped. This applies
> to browsers, services, editors... It is inexcusable to
> punish the user by requiring some elaborate sequence to atone,
> e.g. open the task editor, find and kill some processes.

thank you ,I see!