NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:24:46 -0600 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:24:44 +0000 From: lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> Organization: Trollbusters 3 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: two JARs References: <69022de5-1be1-42a1-8c2b-2c5c8f96d532@googlegroups.com> <5e625e1e-0f7b-428b-abc9-bc9c35790e30@googlegroups.com> <51279525$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> In-Reply-To: <51279525$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Lines: 49 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-2wyaCANmWsllW+Z42zmjvhYC4xIGGt/NVpUjeY0E3LQ4zfwegRwb/HJgZXOxOh6v5t764MPui92JqKS!yjNLubN+YhxMpNHZ6kxuPN1RH/WOqwxKmdC5NpOfdgXLk0isNhdJAFInORlNy2QpvniSoJ4jtU0= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3114 Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:22451 On 22/02/13 15:56, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 2/22/2013 4:24 AM, lipska the kat wrote: >> On 22/02/13 02:25, Lew wrote: >>> Roedy Green wrote: [snip] >> >> If you don't like a post the DON'T REPLY it's so simple even you should >> be able to understand that one. > > In general it is better to learn people how to solve problem > (by reading the documentation) than by explaining the specific > solution. It's quite amazing how certain people in this group pounce on newbies and pompously correct their English yet when old hands mess up the silence is deafening. Because I'm in a much nicer frame of mind that I was this morning allow me to respectfully correct your English .. no don't bother too thank me, really, I'm pleased to do it. ... it is better to *teach* people how to solve [a] problem ... > There are at least one meaning of F in RTFM where I don't see > a problem using that acronym. there *is* at least one value for F in RTFM where ... Oh REALLY, and which version do you think Bloch is espousing. What is the point of lurking in this group if all you do is berate people for asking questions ... what question would *not* elicit a response of RTFM. I'd be interested to know ... really, fascinated in fact. What magnificent pearl of wisdom are you reluctant to cast before the proletarian swine in c.l.j.p that cannot be gleaned from Reading The Friendly Manual. In fact why bother to answer any question, why not set up an auto-responder that simply responds to *every* post to c.l.j.p with a simple RTFM. FFS lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun