Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 11:10:33 -0600
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 17:10:31 +0000
From: lipska the kat <lipskathekat@yahoo.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Java servlet on browsers: dying or kicking ?
References: <op.wpty1lcojie2kg@sl-home.mshome.net> <50d892e5$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <op.wpt8ogiewv4027@kiat-1> <50dbf6d1$0$80176$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <50dcfecc$0$292$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50dd5b51$0$80184$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <raadnU-8Z6xqRkDNnZ2dnUVZ8madnZ2d@bt.com> <50de2260$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <JfBDs.90567$2v.68591@newsfe05.iad> <50df9c4b$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <nUoEs.1$Z03.0@newsfe23.iad> <kc7rol$8pu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <iJ6dneWU5fALzHTNnZ2dnUVZ7qednZ2d@bt.com> <50e99980$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
In-Reply-To: <50e99980$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <Q_Kdnfr21vWULXTNnZ2dnUVZ8iCdnZ2d@bt.com>
Lines: 33
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser
X-Trace: sv3-4Kkx2R42LVmNyME0RkFDJQlcIDPjpxIgd7ZUYOfyeXBwZl1bWdjhA0hpt9n6NxiBqaFww5oWHV7XoEW!FfB2Kq4MvlqXY2Epj00nO+4kn5rrWXGxOFMRKTXiUrrd3xvV8HWxx0JsBJytLq82WR+tepBu+/g=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2975
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:21040

On 06/01/13 15:34, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 1/6/2013 5:27 AM, lipska the kat wrote:
>> On 05/01/13 00:22, Richard Maher wrote:
>>> "Arved Sandstrom"<asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:nUoEs.1$Z03.0@newsfe23.iad...

[snip]

> In a SOA world each service will be responsible for its
> own business logic.

One definition of an SOA is that

Services are unassociated, loosely coupled units of functionality that 
have no calls to each other embedded in them <wikipedia>

This being the case then it will be even more important to manage the 
possible combinations of what will effectively be calls on your business 
logic. You can't simply allow your various departments to publish a 
random collection of services and let anyone combine them in any way 
they like. As I see it a SOA while providing maximum flexibility 
clientside will be even more dependent on some central repository of 
rules that will need to be applied at some stage in the interaction 
lifecycle. Allowing different interpretations of critical business 
process will surely be an invitation to chaos and disaster.

Or maybe I'm being over cautious.

lipska

-- 
Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer
and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun