Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail From: Wanja Gayk Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Assigning void Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:03:08 +0200 Organization: Netfront http://www.netfront.net/ Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.176.244.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1351108989 84734 77.176.244.5 (24 Oct 2012 20:03:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:03:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:19490 In article , Eric Sosman (esosman@comcast- dot-net.invalid) says... > Seriously, the fact that C permits the ?: operator with void > operands is an historical accident Could you elaborate that in more depth please? What's so bad about it in your opinion? Kind regards, Wanja -- ..Alesi's problem was that the back of the car was jumping up and down dangerously - and I can assure you from having been teammate to Jean Alesi and knowing what kind of cars that he can pull up with, when Jean Alesi says that a car is dangerous - it is. [Jonathan Palmer] --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---