Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!news.glorb.com!news-spur2.glorb.com!homer.glorb.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: JNA performance
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 13:27:26 -0700
Organization: Glorb Internet Services, http://www.glorb.com
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <MPG.28309c843c94d5f2989736@news.justthe.net>
References: <tqmdnUiqqro_tlvQnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <qmdcs6hrgicldcrr8sa3irkr3n1me4vaon@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xoAFiuXnRqdiUJrjkwExXQ.user.posting2.glorb.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@glorb.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 20:27:34 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
X-Notice: Scanned by Mr. Bill
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3826

In article <qmdcs6hrgicldcrr8sa3irkr3n1me4vaon@4ax.com>, Roedy Green 
says...
> 
> On Sun, 8 May 2011 15:35:08 +1000, "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com>
> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
> 
> >I am about to do some Java programming involving native libraries so can 
> >anyone comment on their experiences with the performance of JNA?  I note the 
> >following (somewhat concerning) statement from the JNA website:
> 
> I presume you mean JNI not JNA.

JNA is an alternative to JNI:

http://jna.java.net/

It's much easier to use.

"JNA" is probably *not* a typo.



-- 
Steve Sobol - Programming/WebDev/IT Support
sjsobol@JustThe.net