Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 13:21:03 -0600 Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:21:00 +0000 From: lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> Organization: Trollbusters 3 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120410 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Boolean References: <38e873e0-549a-417c-b45b-9b9d52f65880@googlegroups.com> <51306447$0$1206$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <90683973-c8ab-4c79-b132-d6f45e939a69@googlegroups.com> <51345776$0$1385$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <093b4a9b-e2d8-4fdd-bc13-1eae629d9289@googlegroups.com> <5137eb06$0$32109$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Lines: 47 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-AuthenticatedUsername: NoAuthUser X-Trace: sv3-2OHnV4uGgVh+9ktiAoKEPCAtNaEot7P27eGcQiDp9jA+FL4MLv41IAXABLGcfBmBxVf1onqppb3/42y!oYlYQ04uP970xAlR7GQpbENtgZr3GwVSc3OeUvOi8o3gVCqwNz4Rf1JPHW+f/+Fe5l0i63U3XLc= X-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@btinternet.com X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 3077 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:22801 On 07/03/13 17:58, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > On Thu, 07 Mar 2013 08:50:11 +0000, lipska the kat<"nospam at > neversurrender dot co dot uk"> wrote: > >> On 07/03/13 01:19, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> On 3/4/2013 2:38 PM, Lew wrote: >>>> JLP wrote: >>>>> Lew a écrit : >>>>>> JLP wrote: >>>>>>> Nota : Class names must start with a capital letter >>>>>> Not "must", "should". >> >> [snip] >> >>>> This is not a question of knowing English but of knowing technical terms. >> >> Must and should are not 'technical terms' for goodness sake. > > In an RFC, they are. > >> "Technical terminology is the specialized vocabulary of any field" >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_terminology. >> >> Must and should are not "the specialized vocabulary" of any field, are they? > > If they have a precise definition for use in the field, then they > are. Gene !!! my goodness, all the old faeces are here tonight aren't they. Now listen *very carefully* Must and should are *not* technical terms, really, they are common words. Granted the OP used them in a way that was technically incorrect but that doesn't make them technical terms does it? Glad to see you back Gene, looking forward to many more opportunities to point out you misconceptions :-) After all, that's what people do here isn't it? And there's me thinking it was a language group. lipska -- Lipska the Kat©: Troll hunter, sandbox destroyer and farscape dreamer of Aeryn Sun