Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15566
| From | Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Local vs. network file |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <l5KdnS_4P9pgoHrSnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <a4ov8oF930U1@mid.individual.net> <PJednaie7P_-0HrSnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <nb1dv4z3gq48.15acrjvtu4vh2.dlg@40tude.net> <yqidncZLM--8y3rSnZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| Message-ID | <L_CdncfY1bpA9HrSnZ2dnUVZ8jWdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-06-24 14:26 -0500 |
Qu0ll <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Peter. > > I have a requirement to limit a program which is licensed as "stand alone" > to not be run from a network location so I figured if I could tell whether > the launch directory was a network share then I could block it. Is there > another way I could implement this? I'd say that this requirement is a good example of why one should not dictate a technical solution in the requirements. To require a local installation is something that made some amount of sense fifteen years ago or so, but today it's a badly outdated concept. Not only do people and businesses not use network shares in quite the same way as they did fiteen years ago, they no longer think of them the same either. If politically possible, backtrack to the actual business requirement and see if you can solve that in a better way. -- Leif Roar Moldskred
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Local vs. network file "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2012-06-25 02:18 +1000
Re: Local vs. network file Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-24 18:57 +0200
Re: Local vs. network file "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2012-06-25 03:24 +1000
Re: Local vs. network file Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-06-24 10:49 -0700
Re: Local vs. network file "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2012-06-25 04:01 +1000
Re: Local vs. network file Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-24 14:12 -0400
Re: Local vs. network file Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-24 20:20 +0200
Re: Local vs. network file Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-06-24 14:26 -0500
Re: Local vs. network file Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-24 20:14 +0200
Re: Local vs. network file Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-06-24 13:10 -0700
Re: Local vs. network file "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2012-06-28 19:10 +1000
Re: Local vs. network file Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-06-28 11:39 +0200
Re: Local vs. network file Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-06-28 07:31 -0700
Re: Local vs. network file Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-02 19:33 +0200
Re: Local vs. network file Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-07-02 21:49 +0200
Re: Local vs. network file Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-02 16:18 -0400
Re: Local vs. network file Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-07-02 13:32 -0700
Re: Local vs. network file Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-02 18:32 -0400
Re: Local vs. network file Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 16:25 -0700
Re: Local vs. network file Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-07-02 17:35 -0700
Re: Local vs. network file Nine of Seventeen <n9seventeen17@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 21:10 -0400
Re: Local vs. network file uBend <d0b@d1b.d1b.null> - 2012-07-02 22:45 -0400
Re: Local vs. network file j00sUck <j00-s.U-c_k@gmail.com> - 2012-07-02 22:59 -0400
csiph-web