Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.11.MISMATCH!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe11.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
From: David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Arithmetic overflow checking
References: <015aeb15-57db-48ab-9cd4-77f8448b632f@w24g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <knha175c4hu8491pmmek09thqmo7niq3s2@4ax.com> <1f9c17dltrhlmhifuigoa914477r4rg1e1@4ax.com> <l_qdnfmZ-4tpt4vTnZ2dnUVZ_sqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <koic171t5gas91890r8l9914v26snm7k1v@4ax.com> <b3d4a08b-3428-442a-8cce-30edc2868a47@5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <09fe171s46ilvq9qmn254dctunm6noh0ps@4ax.com> <f6ed8d08-bc7a-43e4-aecf-878511705353@j15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <4e262731$0$314$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j059o8$684$1@dont-email.me> <4e26300b$0$309$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <cdyVp.5929$Vn5.2217@newsfe18.iad> <4e26b4ed$0$2501$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk> <f126e0ad-e1e5-47c8-949e-e38b3598d5ff@m5g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <4e28097f$0$2533$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk> <f9939820-502d-4973-b008-0b62536ab967@m3g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <slrnj2ghv0.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <7a23c9d2-508f-4dbd-af91-8cdf2a9764e1@p29g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <j09t06$4bo$1@dont-email.me> <slrnj2jc3u.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
In-Reply-To: <slrnj2jc3u.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <IMBWp.68441$5v5.52239@newsfe11.iad>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.193.237.254
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cogeco.net
X-Trace: newsfe11.iad 1311434920 67.193.237.254 (Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:28:40 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 15:28:40 UTC
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 11:28:36 -0400
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6452

On 22/07/2011 1:16 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
> I'm not sure which relation to the current discussion you might have had
> in mind for posting your example, but having to resort to some wordy
> prefix-notation instead of infix-notation, may indeed just be comparable
> to fiddling with native machine code libraries compared to jar-files.

I have done all of those things, and for me, having to deal with method 
calls instead of infix (while annoying) is nowhere near as painful as 
the library comparison. Plus IMHO getting operator overloading *right* 
in a language isn't exactly trivial. It's not horrible, but not trivial 
either.