Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:12:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:12:28 +0100
From: bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120429 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Oracle/Google demonstrate human beings cannot write 10 lines of code without making a mistake ;)
References: <b3f1b$4fb4f87c$5419acc3$14079@cache60.multikabel.net> <29308868.1994.1337265697084.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcuc6> <e69c4$4fb51b41$5419acc3$11300@cache100.multikabel.net> <slrnjra97k.d62.fis@iris.zem.fi> <84131$4fb54067$5419acc3$20839@cache90.multikabel.net> <jp3g9r$v22$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4e980$4fb56cac$5419acc3$13190@cache60.multikabel.net> <jp3sbr$s52$1@dont-email.me> <slrnjrau0n.f5o.fis@iris.zem.fi> <ce693$4fb5871f$5419acc3$19177@cache80.multikabel.net> <jp48rq$6s8$1@dont-email.me> <34ebb$4fb7e404$5419acc3$23502@cache50.multikabel.net>
In-Reply-To: <34ebb$4fb7e404$5419acc3$23502@cache50.multikabel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <D7CdnVF4t4Tx9CfSnZ2dnUVZ8jydnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Lines: 9
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-5djJWqs/svFcuYj2U3f+UOE5Od+JWAJj5G0/IlgoSYrsSc0ZkeAP1SY0MDyN5mLvNouv3JmqrvbcB+K!YhiWaAMD1mci8WLvDBukydn+hHaj0+EIPxvyppK12rR/6v0TP6NiPkICHgB3u11l04yVOJp9yYgj!7SP/uEEcW5gavSWQsggLcNTgCQ==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2038
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:21137 comp.lang.java.programmer:14740

Skybuck Flying wrote:

>
> The only thing hinting that it might be a private method is the static keyword, well excuse me for not being a java expert ;)

You might want to stop making a fool of
yourself by commenting in ignorance.

  BugBear