Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Immutable Datastructures with good Sharing
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2011 11:52:15 +0100
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <CADD76EF.8FEB%bravegag@hotmail.com>
References: <j9292v$f69$1@news.albasani.net> <jamdnUwVbvmRMSjTnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <j94ajg$ost$1@news.albasani.net> <IuednQhC8Y-dLSjTnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <j94bip$r6v$1@news.albasani.net> <j94bqu$r6v$2@news.albasani.net> <qotwrbdbspe.fsf@ruuvi.it.helsinki.fi> <j95jkv$p42$1@news.albasani.net> <UCvtq.20364$Cr1.10065@newsfe03.iad> <j961n4$uts$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnjbd6fu.fvg.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <CADC63E1.8F1D%bravegag@hotmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111062256510.4201@urchin.earth.li> <j975e4$t80$2@news.albasani.net> <CADCE086.8F7F%bravegag@hotmail.com> <slrnjbfceh.fvg.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Qd/Pw47sHEXKb4c3W/ZIRgD7kpTZTRozQui9irwNQR9F0kcxC9
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IJrI3WOkd8Ox0mxyJeoIWl9PDhA=
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.31.0.110725
Thread-Topic: Immutable Datastructures with good Sharing
Thread-Index: AcydO0+Kb7T/YAsHv0STNHpsGG6ulA==
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:9735

On 11/7/11 11:24 AM, in article slrnjbfceh.fvg.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at,
"Andreas Leitgeb" <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> If you're stuck to 1.6 now, there might be some temptation to resort
> to tricks for gaining generic type inference even for the second, but
> be aware, that this is not exactly a "future investment" for the
> maintainability of your code.
>
Am I stuck to 1.6? static methods with generics in Java 1.6 is a "trick" and
obsolete in 1.7?