Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2607
| X-FeedAbuse | http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.16.109 |
|---|---|
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!usenet-fr.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe17.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail |
| From | David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Refactoring discovery |
| References | <kbgoo6dfrkh58r3ogel9nb6rekrs258it2@4ax.com> <imi716$qhk$1@dont-email.me> <values-20110326204223@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| In-Reply-To | <values-20110326204223@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 18 |
| Message-ID | <BbMkp.1469$0s5.278@newsfe17.iad> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 67.193.237.254 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@cogeco.net |
| X-Trace | newsfe17.iad 1301516129 67.193.237.254 (Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:15:29 UTC) |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:15:29 UTC |
| Date | Wed, 30 Mar 2011 16:15:26 -0400 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:2607 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 26/03/2011 3:43 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Joshua Cranmer<Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> writes:
>> But mathematical functions return only one value;
>
> In mathematics, there is no clear-drawn distinction between
> »one value« and »multiple values«. For example, one
> says that f, defined as f(x,y):=x+y, is a function of
> »two arguments«, yet one usually gives »f: R × R -> R«,
> which literally means: it is a function of /one/ argument,
> which happens to be a pair. And of course, one can have
> functions ... -> R x R.
>
And out of left field comes currying and/or closures:
g: x -> (y -> z)
where (f(x))(y) = g(x,y). But it's sometimes annoying that leaving
unbound the "second argument" of what you though of as a 2-argument
function is privileged over leaving the 1st argument unbound.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: Refactoring discovery David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-03-30 16:15 -0400
csiph-web