Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: [Windows] Any way to distinguish ^C Induced EOF from ^Z EOF?
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:49:10 +0100
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <9s79amFuhnU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <jjj3ke$jev$1@news.albasani.net> <4f5d18ef$0$291$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <jjj6m3$qep$1@news.albasani.net> <4f5d239d$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <jjj8ll$v36$1@news.albasani.net> <jjja9e$f43$1@dont-email.me> <jjkhbj$tuq$1@news.albasani.net> <4f5e146b$0$6971$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <jjlj63$dip$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net NAA6SpVY3uCvA2Meiz0OYgqjJj5ZWl6xnJ3cfSF99kZrbEEI0=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OldNwwZMjqg6hSsbS6fShY3cxG4=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
In-Reply-To: <jjlj63$dip$1@news.albasani.net>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:12922

On 03/12/2012 08:35 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Silvio Bierman schrieb:
>> Given the fact that tons of developers have consistently chosen
>> differently since 1995, it is very likely that your view on this is
>> flawed.
>
> I guess your are subject to the same brainwash like
> the subjects in "The Emperor's New Clothes". I even
> don't feel pitty for you.

Unfortunately most conspiracy theories are wrong - there is usually not 
the subject or group with worst of intentions who managed to trick 
everybody else into believing some BS.  Reality is often so much more 
complicated - or much simpler, in any case: very different from what 
CT's suggest.

Kind regards

	robert