Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Blocks for scope control
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:32:26 +0100
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <9ngdd9Fv6mU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <dBCQq.122$d%2.16@newsfe07.iad> <block-20120115171817@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: individual.net DHxHUqubbB+FvFyEMPuXpgyLW2V8y8yyNZKNaoZDgdLJw8XB0=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pCW5CEMLuOHn72Vg4tW6Rhj0E/E=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
In-Reply-To: <block-20120115171817@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11348

On 15.01.2012 17:18, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Arved Sandstrom<asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca>  writes:
>> Any thoughts?
>
>    Im using this whenever it makes sense. For example,
>    say you wanted to add a button:
>
> { final Button button =3D new Button(); frame.add( button ); }

Why do you think it makes sense to replace this

frame.add( new Button() );

with the block above?  If initialization is more complex, I'd rather do t=
his

frame.add( createButton() );

than

>    or apply the refactor =BBextract method=AB:
>
> void m( final Frame frame )
> { final Button button =3D new Button(); frame.add( button ); }

Cheers

	robert

--=20
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/