Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm.myrealbox@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: OT names/nyms/etc. (was Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects?)
Date: 10 Jul 2011 19:15:40 GMT
Organization: None
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <97uc2sFag8U5@mid.individual.net>
References: <d0bb9e06-16f0-4282-a37e-47e9ca9630ec@r2g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <97p5rcF9ofU1@mid.individual.net> <47c858b8-e02c-4fc8-9557-9b224d932de9@u30g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <q9fi17d6ighs81ck2qqr8j8evoecq0fdif@4ax.com>
X-Trace: individual.net peo26pmklGfWvkv5Qn4/mwFcCq1QenHLmnHvqBdJcYnb40jFDa
X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vsbA6tSRgfNBHVe8uRgG9jlrLag=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6057 comp.lang.lisp:4625

In article <q9fi17d6ighs81ck2qqr8j8evoecq0fdif@4ax.com>,
Steve Erwin  <trollHunter@Usenet.4.usenetizens.org.invalid> wrote:
> lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> wrote:
> >blm...@myrealbox.com wrote:
> >> Steve Erwin wrote:
> 
> >>> The fact you are bothered to break thread, creating
> >>> a new topic, yet fixing your nym display isn't a big
> >>> deal to you... is very interesting. But I aint got the
> >>> time ..
> >>
> >
> >There's nothing whatsoever wrong with her "nym display", as you are
> >pleased to call it.  If you really didn't have the time to pursue this
> >meaningless and pointless complaint of yours, you'd've never pressed
> >"Send".  Advice you should consider.
> >
> pkb... anyone?
> 
> >> "Break thread"?  I'm following what I understood to be the
> >> convention for signaling that the subject of a discussion
> >> has changed without losing the connection to the previous
> >> discussion:  I changed the subject line to "$NEWTOPIC
> >> (was $OLDTOPIC)" and included (or more properly "allowed
> >> my newsreader to supply) a References header that links to
> >> the replied-to post.  I understood this to be considered
> >> good Usenet etiquette.  I guess mileage varies.
> >>
> My point - Ms Massingill -  is, it is interesting you follow this 
> "rule of etiquette" yet ignore basic rules of network protocol 
> in tX'n an unkempt (shoddy - bogan) 

Could you try that again in something more closely resembling
standard English ....  Nah, I probably get enough of the intended
meaning.

> piece of bagatelle as 
> your "From". Small chops (as it is) it has certainly signaled to 
> Paul Derbyshire (lewbloch+KitKat) 

Are you seriously suggesting that both of these posters are Mr.
Derbyshire in disguise?  That would surprise me very much in the
case of the person who posts as Lew Bloch.  I've been following
this group for several years, and -- I'm skeptical.  <shrug>

> you are 
> "ripe for the fucking with of".

I guess it's possible, but really, didn't *I* start this particular
exchange by involving myself in the "names ending in 'a' are
feminine" subthread?  foolishly, no doubt, but "yeah well".

Also, if your theory about real identities is correct, there may
be a history -- but that's all I'm going to say about that.  

> However, as said, you have been informed. You make your 
> choice, as you will.

[ snip ]

-- 
B. L. Massingill
ObDisclaimer:  I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.