Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: blmblm@myrealbox.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: OT language stuff (was Re: Class.forName().newInstance() vs new) Date: 21 Jun 2011 20:42:16 GMT Organization: None Lines: 27 Message-ID: <96ce18Fc6lU3@mid.individual.net> References: <969kqsFjduU5@mid.individual.net> X-Trace: individual.net pdib+XpxwnQpVUraSYMLLAx5YBTPlugSn0xVKPS580yvmqWUrs X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail Cancel-Lock: sha1:M0DxwkzbidXh84uSo0wpORFkDw4= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5483 In article , Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 19:19:56 +0000, blmblm@myrealbox.com wrote: > > > In article , Arved Sandstrom > > wrote: > > > >> I blame lack of reading > >> for this problem; it's not possible to make these mistakes (or for that > >> matter, to be a bad speller, period) if you read voraciously. > > > > You think? I sometimes wonder if some people's brains are wired to care > > about spelling, and others' aren't. > > > I'm with Arved here: quite a lot of mistakes would appear to indicate the > author is an almost illiterate person who listens more than he reads, e.g > writing 'your' instead of 'you're'. A lot of the more (to me) irritating > habits are probably the result of not realising that spoken idiom differs > from written, e.g. using 'of' in place of 'with' - this seems to be a > North American habit. Say what .... Can you give an example of that ('of' instead of 'with')? -- B. L. Massingill ObDisclaimer: I don't speak for my employers; they return the favor.