Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail From: "H.J. Sander Bruggink" Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Call by Result Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:09:42 +0200 Lines: 21 Message-ID: <95u6jnFdkqU1@mid.dfncis.de> References: <95e4uuF3cvU1@mid.individual.net> <8CtIp.4644$PA5.4578@newsfe01.iad> <4df5290c$0$49183$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.dfncis.de d+HtE46knJ4wzh8y5gOXDwCn7XrjYiI1QGW4ZPNuzv4Ybn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 In-Reply-To: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5332 On 06/16/2011 01:03 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > Michael Wojcik wrote: >> In the Verona of functional languages, the ML family are the Montagues >> to the LISP family's Capulets. Or something like that. > > :-) > > And to which of these two families is Prolog more related to? > It does make lot of use of expression-matching like the MLs, > but seems to be quite different, still. A distant cousin? > Prolog is not a functional language but a logical language and does not use matching but unification. But all programming languages influence each other, so probably all programming languages are distant cousins of all other ones :-). groente -- Sander