Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Android: create drawable from path Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:38:15 +0100 Organization: Dirk Bruere at Neopax Lines: 59 Message-ID: <90qlgfFt2vU1@mid.individual.net> References: <90opnjFunsU1@mid.individual.net> <908b85be-4c87-4bd6-b5f1-4b82ffeea13e@b13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <90p3v4Fe4fU1@mid.individual.net> <90pfmdF17bU1@mid.individual.net> <99mdnexwGbGIDDrQnZ2dnUVZ_h6dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <90pkrcF1aaU1@mid.individual.net> Reply-To: dirk.bruere@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net lD+hFc02kwPotXZZPm3oTQBu9uYX13C2+9aMkXefTPGq4mmlyA Cancel-Lock: sha1:qx4UpoCka0wl4g0B6CDXGxF7gtU= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 In-Reply-To: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3075 On 15/04/2011 05:20, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > On 4/14/2011 6:20 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >> On 15/04/2011 01:28, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >>> On 4/14/2011 4:52 PM, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote: >>>> On 14/04/2011 23:32, Lew wrote: >>> ... >>>>> That information was *not* in your post, so no, there was *not* enough >>>>> information in your post. I am happy that we found the correct answer >>>>> despite that. It is strange that you're claiming to have provided >>>>> enough >>>>> information by citing data that you did not provide us. >>>> >>>> Because at the time I did not know it was relevent >>> >>> That is the perfect summary of the argument in favor of constructing and >>> posting an SSCCE. >>> >>> An SSCCE includes all actually relevant information, regardless of >>> whether the person constructing the SSCCE is aware of its relevance. >>> >>> Constructing a non-SSCCE excerpt the contains all information that is >>> actually relevant is much harder. It requires the programmer to know >>> what is relevant to the problem without knowing enough to solve it, a >>> rare condition. >>> >>> Patricia >> >> Well, I have just got another problem that cannot be done this way, >> unless I post the whole program. >> >> I have multiple listviews each containing hundreds of strings. >> I switch between them with various buttons. >> When they load, they are fine. >> However, if I use a finger to scroll the screen up and then switch to >> another listview while the last one is still scrolling I get entries >> broken into multiple lines that persist. > > It sure sounds like SSCCE material to me. I would start with questions > like how many listviews are needed, and how many strings per view. 4 listviews, with between 100 and 2000 strings in each >> My bug, Android 2.2 bug or h/w problem? >> > > If this happened in non-Android Java, I would suggest checking that all > GUI activity is on the event dispatching thread. It sounds as though the > view change is being processed before the scroll has finished, which > should be prevented by doing both in the same thread. > > Maybe you should do the equivalent check? Yes. Anyway, its not a major bug - there are other things to do first -- Dirk http://www.neopax.com/technomage/ - My new book - Magick and Technology