Received: by 10.68.217.129 with SMTP id oy1mr3469093pbc.3.1350337706875; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.219.198 with SMTP id pq6mr2842277pbc.0.1350337706862; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!kr7no30798816pbb.0!news-out.google.com!jt13ni6326pbb.1!nntp.google.com!kr7no30798815pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:48:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.29 References: <3a63483c-4322-4bfb-8c28-2d528bf48443@googlegroups.com> <9ac3b7f9-5751-410f-bac3-50703b976b6d@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8f3e19c3-e015-4c0a-b8f5-015fd5c9ffbf@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Operation in String to Double conversion From: Lew Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:48:26 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:19382 frank...@gmail.com wrote: >Lew wrote: >> If you cannot even promote a product with professionalism and attention to >> detail, it is very unlikely the product will reflect a higher standard. > > again i [sic] beg to differ. the code quality has got nothing to do with the manner an article about the > library is written. i think judging a developer's skill based on his professionalism as an editor is like > saying a monkey can't climb because he sucks at flying. You can make up all the cute similes you like, but my experience is solid in this area. Illiterate descriptions rarely correspond to quality products. >> He already gave you constructive criticism and you acted like a jerk about it. > > well i [sic] certainly didn't call him a jerk for having a different opinion. > so in order not to succumb to godwin's law i [sic] won't respond to any more posts regarding the > manner in which i [sic] choose to write. Good luck with that attitude. You'll need it. And you not calling him a jerk didn't mean you didn't act like one. Your whole attitude is resentful and hostile despite being given good advice. No one but you cares about your ego. -- Lew