Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8135
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!novia!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!postnews.google.com!d12g2000vba.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "giuseppe.on.usenet" <giuseppe.on.usenet@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: super |
| Date | Sun, 18 Sep 2011 12:21:09 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 17 |
| Message-ID | <797b5b56-9855-4ff1-a1e9-1eef2dcef7a8@d12g2000vba.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <3e87dcf3-6842-41bf-8eb8-0c4181a178a9@k1g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <j55ad2$o2g$1@dont-email.me> <slrnj7cdtu.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 62.123.12.178 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1316373794 17644 127.0.0.1 (18 Sep 2011 19:23:14 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:23:14 +0000 (UTC) |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | d12g2000vba.googlegroups.com; posting-host=62.123.12.178; posting-account=yPSY1QoAAACMZ51-SS0_t9poa1zrLE1H |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-Header-Order | HUARLECNK |
| X-HTTP-UserAgent | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PPC Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.50.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.6 Safari/533.22.3,gzip(gfe) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8135 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 18 Set, 20:26, Andreas Leitgeb <a...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > I think the misunderstanding is far more basic. > > To giuseppe: > > In dir2.GrandChild's main, just remove the line, where you instantiate > Child, and leave the rest exactly as is. Recompile & run it. You'll > see that instantiating class Child (or not doing it) doesn't change > anything. What does this tell you? I am not the author :) I found that code in a certification study guide (the original question was: What will the output be?). Maybe they instantiated the Child object just to try to confuse the reader. Actually, I don't think the question was very simple, because you are not supposed to use a compiler during the exam.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
super "giuseppe.on.usenet" <giuseppe.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 09:53 -0700
Re: super Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-09-18 12:39 -0500
Re: super Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-09-18 18:26 +0000
Re: super Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-09-18 18:29 +0000
Re: super "giuseppe.on.usenet" <giuseppe.on.usenet@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 12:21 -0700
Re: super Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-09-18 19:48 +0000
Re: super Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-18 13:16 -0700
csiph-web