Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed1.swip.net!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Instance java.lang.Object.getClass() of Class Java Method on OO Tumia Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:50:05 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 28 Message-ID: <7144029.385.1328521805784.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prfs3> References: <9d6c9c81-3b61-4ee5-b1bb-b399e0f53dc1@s9g2000vbc.googlegroups.com> <572ba397-4369-4033-8fee-54b22fbd8677@k6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com> <32802338.1556.1328425716958.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prhu31> <0e8b5554-d19e-4a0b-9840-409d893b6ac7@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> <8457013.1958.1328471129375.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmu37> <25138740-03d5-4668-a243-6994eb43dbd5@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: comp.lang.java.programmer@googlegroups.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.164.137.214 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328521922 893 127.0.0.1 (6 Feb 2012 09:52:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:52:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <25138740-03d5-4668-a243-6994eb43dbd5@1g2000yqv.googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.164.137.214; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11789 Paka Small wrote: > You write "> Statement A, as you call it, was an objection to your > blatant misrepresentation >> that methods are classes, and a fair one.". Nowhere and never I have stated >> that methods are classes. Please have the decency not to put words in my mouth! You put these words in your own mouth: "My statement (a method is also a class which has method instances) is proven by the Oracle Java link above and backed up with 20 years of professional software development experience." I did not lack decency. I was merely stating a fact. That was your statement, and it is not true. You also said: "Please can you pinpoint where in this document is written that a Java method is not an instance of the class Method." Not true. You also excoriated Daniel's post, saying, "you put out with such vigour your statement ('Those aren't instances, they are called methods.') that is totally incorrect." Not true. You put these statements forward. I copied and pasted them into this post. I did not make them up. You said them. How strange that you now deny saying them. Still, they're a matter of public record so there's no denying responsibility. -- Lew