Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gene Wirchenko Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: CLI Java Glitch Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:54:51 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 27 Message-ID: <6uh407hqqfhm68t2eio89of2ftm9sk3vdb@4ax.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7Qrvczazr82YckO5XW8Vtw"; logging-data="26528"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18GRFOrC8e2gjKLUzc81AACAXVh5mdfLkU=" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 Cancel-Lock: sha1:KaJoUeuL1DYj51gXPQf+UxLU7+M= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5542 On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:01:20 -0400, Jeff Higgins wrote: >On 06/22/2011 01:18 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: [snip] >> Look at it this way. If Java were being spec'ed right now, > >The behavior under discussion has been specified and is implemented and >can now only be re-specified and implemented. > >> would you have an objection to what I propose? > >Yes because it would break a lot of others stuff. What stuff? "If Java were being spec'ed right now", then nothing would get broken. [snip] Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko