Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!217.73.144.45.MISMATCH!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:54:49 -0600
From: Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com>
Subject: Re: Curious compiler warning
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
References: <Xns9FD6D451D5F1Djpnasty@94.75.214.39> <jeir2s$7v0$3@news.albasani.net> <jeisjs$4k4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jeiu63$es3$1@news.albasani.net> <KUcPq.69975$Dr1.36221@newsfe08.iad> <jek2kn$i1b$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jek824$sqv$1@news.albasani.net> <o4gsg7pl34pg411bmmm2232d6s9a062nqj@4ax.com> <jem2ab$7t2$2@news.albasani.net> <1YqdnV__oobHEpPSnZ2dnUVZ7sudnZ2d@giganews.com> <ItydnQqFSvjEnJLSnZ2dnUVZ_gWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
User-Agent: tin/2.0.0-20110823 ("Ardenistiel") (UNIX) (Linux/3.0.0-14-generic-pae (i686))
Message-ID: <6KOdnSKSc6_EjZLSnZ2dnUVZ8uadnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 10:54:49 -0600
Lines: 10
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1JPI3ZKF4hY40YQYcICeQY4eyd/Mv79RPh6c7l5XxFI+1MRATq6SEjqWpwGz5L2bNgY/s/2QqNpY5EY!LI9+KRYWUtb17l+bgV9ZJx7vEsFHyziO6k1fE+H7RUOkGRrfLPRmlfL7wf0pzYCAgKko3YHosF8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1682
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11278

Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> wrote:
 
> If my thought is "increment x", I prefer "++" because, of the available
> ways of adding one to x, it most directly reflects my intent.

I'll buy that.. I find that I rarely increment variables outside of
for loops, though.

-- 
Leif Roar Moldskred