Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Enderin Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Need clarification on Object.equals. Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:12:28 +0100 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 32 Message-ID: <50D1F57C.4090901@telia.com> References: <909022a2-ead4-45e6-9f43-79b5013e04ee@googlegroups.com> <67da22eb-42d8-40bf-b172-9aac1eef268e@googlegroups.com> <50d13174$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <-vKdnV0vgsl4CUzNnZ2dnUVZ8sOdnZ2d@bt.com> <50d1ca29$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50d1caa3$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50d1d243$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50D1D9FD.4070202@telia.com> <8NGdnZJoQO_qfEzNnZ2dnUVZ8mmdnZ2d@bt.com> <50D1E3F3.5050703@telia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net F7UpTEOCGQaF8fRVXtWIGHweaVhI8fzebVO7WAdKKU1d2d1KnrN7AzVqQF58DflkqG2XAdk+BTdO1KwQ8cq8aw== NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="ItXfbd9xMfRRG1SmePNtkYHESgqAmqt2r31K7Q1EoQvhM58pb60qxBhZGIf+7aELgaD2Yrw2W4y7hojyQFu4lW45Vmyd9kBcBthw21AAly/hnieA12l6u8W+8dbTez+o"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:aa7MsHYVO7xYMNc+fHCZjfygcHY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20555 2012-12-19 17:51, lipska the kat skrev: > On 19/12/12 15:57, Lars Enderin wrote: >> 2012-12-19 16:47, lipska the kat skrev: >>> On 19/12/12 15:15, Lars Enderin wrote: >>>> You're overreacting, in a big way (and there should be no space before >>>> ?). You completely missed the spirit (and point) of Arne's response(s). >>> >>> This is Usenet, if you don't like it, go somewhere else. I do like it so >>> I'm staying and I will continue however futile it may be to stand up >>> against the ludicrous pomposity and arrogance I see here. Get used to >>> it. >> >> Did I imply that I don't like Usenet? You seem to misunderstand a lot. >> And I don't see much pomposity and arrogance here. I've been on Usenet >> for 25 years or more. > > Well you wouldn't I guess > > I have a question > > Why do you (collectively) feel the need to chastise someone for > behaviour that you decide is inappropriate for this group when that > behaviour is not directed at you. I expand on this in a reply to Arne > elsewhere. Why don't you like it when somebody stands up for somebody else? It's not abnormal behaviour. And in this case Arne may have felt that the OP's reply was (also) directed at him. But I am not allowed to answer for Arne, right? -- Lars Enderin