Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "bob smith" <bob.smith@1:261/38.remove-t9h-this>
Subject: hashCode
Message-ID: <50254C53.56590.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
X-Comment-To: All
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
X-FTN-AREA: COMP.LANG.JAVA.PROGRAMMER
X-FTN-MSGID: 1:261/38 5ddc2510
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Gateway: time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98]
Lines: 15
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 18:39:05 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.21.70.65
X-Complaints-To: news@tds.net
X-Trace: newsreading01.news.tds.net 1344623945 69.21.70.65 (Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:39:05 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 13:39:05 CDT
Organization: tds.net
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17644

From: bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com>

Is it always technically correct to override the hashCode function like so:

        @Override
        public int hashCode() {
                return 1;
        }

Would it be potentially better if that was Object's implementation?

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24