Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit4.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Lew" Subject: Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? Message-ID: <501C1566.56030.calajapr@time.synchro.net> X-Comment-To: Wanja Gayk Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer In-Reply-To: <501C1565.56028.calajapr@time.synchro.net> References: <501C1565.56028.calajapr@time.synchro.net> X-FTN-AREA: COMP.LANG.JAVA.PROGRAMMER X-FTN-MSGID: 1:261/38 dad0d181 X-FTN-REPLY: 1:261/38 4e48f155 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gateway: time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98] Lines: 32 Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:54:17 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.21.70.65 X-Complaints-To: news@tds.net X-Trace: newsreading01.news.tds.net 1344020057 69.21.70.65 (Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:54:17 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 13:54:17 CDT Organization: tds.net Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17071 To: Wanja Gayk From: Lew Wanja Gayk wrote: > arne@vajhoej.dk says... >>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable >>> naming, etc. I see no reason to change it for Java. > >> Maybe not. >> >> But it is still a bad idea. >> >> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way. > > "You can write FORTRAN in any language." > > http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535 Funny, but it ducks the point. And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way. I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing Java. -- Lew --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24