Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8341

Re: Style Police (a rant)

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed1.swip.net!news.astraweb.com!border5.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject Re: Style Police (a rant)
Date Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:14:43 +0000
Organization Bandar Bandits
User-Agent Vine News .x666-Tarzan Proof
References <4E6CFF65.4060802@telia.com> <fdff724e-98f3-48e1-901e-c8e1d4ef111f@j19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <be222faf-4b16-4007-b31d-f81f1b07963a@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4E6DBD5D.6020604@telia.com> <98ab45c0-2a9e-4f09-8e11-d128d6ebe206@1g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <d12800ad-543a-46a7-85d8-fbefa0d2b1b8@y6g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <j5jra9$ffh$2@speranza.aioe.org> <4bbd2b63-1fe1-4df2-9297-ecabdd03d00a@dd6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
X-No-Archive yes
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 28
Message-ID <4e80eb44$0$3623$c3e8da3$ff958fdc@news.astraweb.com> (permalink)
NNTP-Posting-Host 4902970a.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace DXC=W?0mX`_09<=YCNS1UYSjA1L?0kYOcDh@:^Z8K;i;@::9Q4O[1bkZfi?XIWYge3mQ6<Hg8e5195Tg>h\;d0<<6cA=6l\4gLoQ]I2faaa]:?3Z35
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8341 comp.os.os2.advocacy:4933

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


<4bbd2b63-1fe1-4df2-9297-ecabdd03d00a@dd6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,Joe
Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com>, wrote:

>On Sep 24, 1:54 am, thoolen <th00...@th0lenbot.thorium> wrote:
>> What does your pontification have to do with Java, Attardi?
>Is this Paul's newest defense mechanism along with "None of the nasty
>things you have said, blah blah, are at all true"?
>
>> Who is "Paul Derbysh!re", Attardi? There is nobody in this newsgroup
>> using that alias.
>Well, of course not. It's your _real_ name, not your alias. Silly
>Paul.
>
>> What does your trolling have to do with Java, Attardi?
>You're cljp's resident troll, and it looks like you've been staying
>busy in the years I've been away.

a wise troll would move to a news server , Joe?
so all can 'see' you.
master Derbyshire has a reputation for using scripted tor 
connections AND crossposting to flame groups.
IP address:                     143.166.255.58
Reverse DNS:                    ausisaw2k3pc111-dmz.aus.amer.dell.com.

could well be Derbyshire is setting up yet another "double-act".
the idiot enjoys a chat to himself.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-11 16:55 -0700
  Re: Style Police (a rant) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-11 20:36 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2011-09-12 10:05 +0200
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 15:35 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2011-09-13 10:35 +0200
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-13 09:48 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-13 12:18 -0700
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-13 17:30 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 21:59 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 10:54 -0700
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 01:54 -0400
            Re: Style Police (a rant) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-09-24 02:58 -0700
              Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 11:35 -0400
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 13:50 -0700
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-26 21:14 +0000
                Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:50 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:47 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 15:17 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 00:50 +0000
              Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:55 -0600
                Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:14 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:11 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:31 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 22:24 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 09:30 +0000
                Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:57 -0600
                Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:38 -0400
                Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:36 -0400
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-09-30 15:58 +0000
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:32 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-30 21:26 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:34 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-01 15:51 -0400
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:18 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-01 16:26 -0400
                Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-10-01 21:25 -0400
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:23 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-05 10:01 -0400
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-07 08:29 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-07 17:34 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 21:58 -0700
  Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-09-12 04:52 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-09-12 05:14 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-09-12 06:42 -0400
        Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-09-12 07:20 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-09-12 08:46 -0400
            Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-12 21:03 -0400

csiph-web