Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8225
| Date | 2011-09-22 21:15 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java EE on tomcat? |
| References | (4 earlier) <j58f7c$4up$1@speranza.aioe.org> <utYdq.12449$Ol1.5245@newsfe07.iad> <ee7db784-e370-40c7-954e-bfa2977c49a9@u20g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> <4e7a82d8$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <174d3864-bc37-4edc-bcfd-af475c11b906@k7g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <4e7bdda1$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 9/22/2011 1:23 PM, nroberts wrote: > On Sep 21, 5:35 pm, Arne Vajhøj<a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote: >> On 9/21/2011 11:45 AM, nroberts wrote: > >> You should do: >> >> requirements => technologies => infrastructure >> >> not the other way around. > > Yes. > >> >> Start by finding out whether you need EJB or not. > > Which is impossible if you don't know what EJB does and what it > provides extra to additional or alternative technologies. > >>> What is it that EJB offers me that I don't get with these other >>> standard technologies? I thought it was things like SessionBeans and >>> such, but if I use the CDI and JSF bits it seems like I get a lot of >>> the same behavior because I've got @ManagedBean or @Named. I'm >>> finding this confusing. >> >> I would consider: >> - session beans and CDI orthogonal >> - session beans and managed beans different > > In what way though? Like Ford and Red being ortogonal and car and airplane being different. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Torsten Kirschner <torsten.kirschner@gmail.com> - 2011-09-19 00:30 +0200
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-09-18 20:44 -0300
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Torsten Kirschner <torsten.kirschner@gmail.com> - 2011-09-20 00:20 +0200
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-09-20 05:50 -0300
Re: Java EE on tomcat? nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 08:45 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 11:19 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 11:31 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-09-21 17:37 -0300
Re: Java EE on tomcat? nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 11:29 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-21 14:26 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-22 10:27 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-22 13:30 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-21 20:40 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-21 20:35 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? nroberts <roberts.noah@gmail.com> - 2011-09-22 10:23 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-22 13:38 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-22 21:15 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-19 21:55 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? eric@invalid.com (EricF) - 2011-09-21 04:38 +0000
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-21 20:29 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? eric@invalid.com (EricF) - 2011-09-22 02:41 +0000
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-09-22 06:08 -0300
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-22 21:18 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-09-22 08:39 -0700
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-22 22:58 +0200
Re: Java EE on tomcat? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-22 18:47 -0400
Re: Java EE on tomcat? eric@invalid.com (EricF) - 2011-09-24 04:45 +0000
csiph-web