Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Ping Lew Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 13:11:54 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 38 Message-ID: <3737114.4.1331154714371.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbnt10> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.29 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1331154714 1254 127.0.0.1 (7 Mar 2012 21:11:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:11:54 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Received-Bytes: 2474 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:12748 Novice wrote: > I finally did the "pop quiz' from the Aspect Questions thread a couple of > days ago, well after I'd originally planned to do it. I see that you > haven't replied. I'm not sure if that's because you don't want to pursue > that discussion of interfaces because I'm getting on your nerves - which I > could understand - or because you're having trouble finding it again like I > am. (I really need a better newsreader than X-Reader. Any suggestions?) I haven't seen your answer. Of course you're not getting on my nerves. Stop being so damned humble. > Or maybe you're just swamped with your own stuff. Or maybe I never saw it. > Anyway, if you are still up for discussing the design of my resume project, > I'd love to do so, although I would prefer to start a new thread. The other > one is just getting really unwieldy.... Always start a new thread for a new conversation on Usenet. > If I have pissed you off, I'm sorry. I can be a bit obtuse at times and > even inadvertently give offense with my assumptions but I assure you I > meant nothing unpleasant. I really just want to learn. I didn't say you gave offense. I said the assumption that I was coercing people into something they don't want _could be construed_ as an insult. > Anyway, thanks for all the help you've rendered on that and previous > threads! You don't piss me off. And if you piss anyone else off, let me know. I'll put'em in their place. -- Lew