Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.co.uk!multikabel.net!newsfeed20.multikabel.net!post40.multikabel.net!cache50.multikabel.net!not-for-mail
From: "Skybuck Flying" <Windows7IsOK@DreamPC2006.com>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.lang.borland-delphi,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.java.programmer
References: <b3f1b$4fb4f87c$5419acc3$14079@cache60.multikabel.net> <29308868.1994.1337265697084.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcuc6> <e69c4$4fb51b41$5419acc3$11300@cache100.multikabel.net> <slrnjra97k.d62.fis@iris.zem.fi> <84131$4fb54067$5419acc3$20839@cache90.multikabel.net> <jp3g9r$v22$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4e980$4fb56cac$5419acc3$13190@cache60.multikabel.net> <jp3sbr$s52$1@dont-email.me> <slrnjrau0n.f5o.fis@iris.zem.fi> <ce693$4fb5871f$5419acc3$19177@cache80.multikabel.net> <jp48rq$6s8$1@dont-email.me>
In-Reply-To: <jp48rq$6s8$1@dont-email.me>
Subject: Re: Oracle/Google demonstrate human beings cannot write 10 lines of code without making a mistake ;)
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:18:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513
Message-ID: <34ebb$4fb7e404$5419acc3$23502@cache50.multikabel.net>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@ziggo.nl
Organization: Ziggo
Lines: 32
NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.25.172.195 (84.25.172.195)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:18:44 +0200
X-Trace: 34ebb4fb7e404f1bc096623502
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:21033 comp.lang.java.programmer:14647



"Joshua Cranmer"  wrote in message news:jp48rq$6s8$1@dont-email.me...

On 5/17/2012 7:18 PM, Skybuck Flying wrote:
> There is no "rangeCheck" function for java.util.Arrays:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Arrays.html
>
> To me it appears as if rangeCheck is some low level operating system
> code or memory management code to try and prevent the os or applications
> from crashing or exploits from taking over the system.

"
It's a private method in java.util.Arrays, which is why the API does not
list it. If you actually read the code you'd posted, you would have
realized that.
"

Nonsense, this code could have come from anywhere.

There is no proof that this came from any api at all.

I have yet to see any proof from the court case that this is actually from 
java.util.Arrays.

The only thing hinting that it might be a private method is the static 
keyword, well excuse me for not being a java expert ;)

Bye,
  Skybuck.