Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gene Wirchenko Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Class.forName().newInstance() vs new Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:01:45 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: <27dvv6hcl77ge95m3ooqkm1c9thh7s8jdm@4ax.com> References: <95ho4qFd7cU1@mid.individual.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7Qrvczazr82YckO5XW8Vtw"; logging-data="29780"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/zTWEpAQEoII8xps8SpHMuV0KB3N7JsaY=" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 Cancel-Lock: sha1:pFXqrtHWkoirXbDGW+0Vi3t4NHU= Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5435 On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:19:06 -0300, Arved Sandstrom wrote: [snip] >I've been trying for years to hit the right balance in blog articles, >design documents, RFP responses, presentations, tutorials, teaching >handouts, Usenet posts and Web forum questions, and also my own writing >for pleasure (this latter itself being of many different types). All I [nice stuff snipped] >I had the pleasure some months back of being commissioned to do 20 days >worth of work writing up a detailed design document in such an >environment. Normally for this client I do maintenance rescue coding, >but in this case the problem was complex and actually required a >developer - not a BA - to do the design. At the end of the 20 days I had >not only a clear and concise *real* detailed design document - one that >another developer could use - but also a working POC of the ^^^ What is this, please? >solution...which hadn't even been expected by the client. It hadn't been >expected mainly because the other software consultancies are loaded with >PMs, BAs and mediocre coders, so the clients aren't used to adequate >performance. [more nice stuff snipped] >So that's why I like clear English. I am rather fond of it myself. Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko