Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: How to turn off those warning messages during ant build? Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 20 Message-ID: <2514833.715.1334433180928.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbckz3> References: <15429764.10.1333589060953.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbae2> <10168300.3443.1333651355770.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcto7> <4f7e2ee4$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4f8772f3$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4f88cddf$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.29 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1334433181 29945 127.0.0.1 (14 Apr 2012 19:53:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:53:01 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <4f88cddf$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T User-Agent: G2/1.0 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:13548 Arne Vajh=F8j wrote: > Are you claiming that it is poor software architecture/development > to write code that does not have a single flaw at time of being written > but 5 or 10 years later give warnings or errors with a new Java > version? I don't know if he is, but I am. The point was made upthread that when you introduce a new Java version, you= must regression-test it like any other system component. If that regressio= n introduces new warnings or errors, and you leave them alone, that's poor = development. Period. The team introduces a change - let's upgrade to Java 5 (already out of date= , BTW). That change introduces regressions. The team ignores the regression= s. How can anyone make the case that that's good software development? --=20 Lew