Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jim Gibson Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: NSGMLS ?? Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:26:15 -0800 Lines: 25 Message-ID: <221220111126153242%jimsgibson@gmail.com> References: <0l81f75fnmkcre26jlebekjp6mjkt7dji2@4ax.com> <25310252.112.1324395860425.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmw6> <15419827.340.1324479717115.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prmw6> <9916f7phfrmc4bai4lcdbvqe8sroo1u2h9@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net fLehSN4kT03sSeCIBpnwzwl0CoBj2aWfscglw8GmmibdDLlQpo X-Orig-Path: jimsgibson Cancel-Lock: sha1:re/TyhjDw8tc2vbxca1WqvQmWhQ= User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X) Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:10958 In article <9916f7phfrmc4bai4lcdbvqe8sroo1u2h9@4ax.com>, Roedy Green wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:01:57 -0800 (PST), Lew > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > > > > >What evidence do you have that it's an acronym? If the founding link (that > >first link in the Google search) doesn't mention it, how would any other > >source > >be authoritative? > > Because it contains another acronym SGML Standard Generalised Markup > Language To be accurate and pedantic, NSGML is not an "acronym", it is a "initialism". > It is not pronounceable. That is another clue. If it were pronounceable, and you pronounced it as a word rather than saying its letters, then it would be an acronym. -- Jim Gibson