Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #5167
| From | Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.programming, comp.lang.java.databases |
| Subject | Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks |
| Date | 2011-06-09 15:01 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <21013c4d-3ae9-4e81-8999-d8c18e620e5c@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <iso8cm$a80$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Jun 8, 9:35 am, Abu Yahya <abu_ya...@invalid.com> wrote: > A small application that I'm making requires me to store very long > strings (>1000 characters) in a database. > > I will need to use these strings later to compare for equality to > incoming strings from another application. I will also want to add some > of the incoming strings to the storage, if they meet certain criteria. > > For my application, I get a feeling that storing these strings in my > table will be a waste of space, and will impact performance due to > retrieval and storage times, as well as comparison times. > > I considered using an SHA-512 hash of these strings and storing them in > the database. However, while these will save on storage space, it will > take time to do the hashing before comparing an incoming string. So I'm > still wasting time. (Collisions due to hashing will not be a problem, > since an occasional false positive will not be fatal for my application). > > What would be the best approach? If it's that relevant that you're asking, measure first to see if it's a problem. If you're that concerned that it will be, then code a number of reasonable alternatives and measure. Presumably you need to do a Map lookup on the incoming strings. I thought about some itern scheme, but that won't work if you're receiving a lot of incoming new strings. Storing hashs could work. Do you need to store the strings in a database? If you can store them locally, maybe a trie? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trie I somewhat doubt (maybe?) that you're going to get much better lookup performance than a trie (but of course I would measure too).
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Storing large strings for future equality checks Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-06-08 22:05 +0530
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks markspace <-@.> - 2011-06-08 09:49 -0700
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2011-06-08 17:28 +0000
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-06-08 23:45 +0530
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-06-08 23:45 +0530
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-08 12:58 -0400
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-06-08 23:49 +0530
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2011-06-08 20:31 +0200
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Harry Tuttle <OTPXDAJCSJVU@spammotel.com> - 2011-06-09 10:50 +0200
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-06-09 11:44 +0100
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Harry Tuttle <OTPXDAJCSJVU@spammotel.com> - 2011-06-10 10:15 +0200
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-06-08 11:07 -0700
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Abu Yahya <abu_yahya@invalid.com> - 2011-06-08 23:58 +0530
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> - 2011-06-09 12:38 +0200
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-06-09 17:32 -0400
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> - 2011-06-10 10:51 +0100
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2011-06-08 20:28 +0200
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-06-08 22:02 +0000
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-06-08 21:38 +0100
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-08 23:20 +0200
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-06-08 23:02 +0100
Re: Storing large strings for future equality checks Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-06-09 15:01 -0700
csiph-web