X-Received: by 10.180.97.198 with SMTP id ec6mr6447799wib.5.1356584009574; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:53:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.163.67 with SMTP id yg3mr7811247igb.12.1356584008959; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:53:28 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!209.85.212.216.MISMATCH!m3no11153666wim.1!news-out.google.com!i11ni266631wiw.0!nntp.google.com!m3no11153662wim.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:53:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6e499946-6fcb-46e6-b961-040b25493850@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.164.137.214; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.164.137.214 References: <94fcfac6-eff5-4e84-956a-8a7970867867@googlegroups.com> <50db8fbd$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <6e499946-6fcb-46e6-b961-040b25493850@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1aa24f9e-c809-4d21-9299-1df4d16a6c64@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: JMS vs Sockets -- bandwidth, size, speed, etc. From: Lew Injection-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 04:53:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20717 On Wednesday, December 26, 2012 8:46:02 PM UTC-8, mche...@gmail.com wrote: > I believe socket has the best performance, i [sic] tried to user [huh?] > socket and pipeline to send data to a c++ [sic] program, socket win [sic]. Sorry, "pipeline"? How does that compare to, say, a JMS in-memory transfer? Under what conditions did you do the measurements? What was your definition of "win"? Did your C++ program do anything significant with the data? Under what load? What competing loads? How many clients? Any threading issues? Your post provides so little detail as to be effectively useless. -- Lew