Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19622
| From | "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.programming |
| References | <f6d6cbfd-8152-4d92-92b5-89a18ac989a5@tr7g2000pbc.googlegroups.com><0.73472d82415d5353822e.20121103155132GMT.87mwyyvg57.fsf@bsb.me.uk><b227ba50-ccbc-4da0-9f6a-31bb809f329d@ah9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com><0.898697c4e5f8819c7fa0.20121104004445GMT.878vaiurgi.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87vcdllg3u.fsf@informatimago.com> |
| Subject | Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. |
| Message-ID | <1Juls.140915$lz1.27777@fx28.am4> (permalink) |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2012-11-04 14:11 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
"Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote in message news:87vcdllg3u.fsf@informatimago.com... > Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> writes: >> All this excludes any mention of the return address. Maybe that's being >> handled separately. > > Well, I don't know of any processor that uses a separate stack for the > frame pointers. Usually because you only need access to one at a time. The OP mentioned a stack just for frame pointers; I assumed (perhaps wrongly), then access to any of them might be needed at any time. If not then a single stack will do. (Or perhaps no real stack at all, as a software data structure seems to be used. Then, any scheme could be employed.) -- Bartc
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 07:45 -0700
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-03 15:51 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 09:22 -0700
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. markspace <-@.> - 2012-11-03 11:20 -0700
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-03 18:58 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 00:49 +0100
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-04 00:44 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 13:14 +0100
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-04 12:48 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-11-04 14:14 +0100
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-04 15:38 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 14:41 +0100
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-04 14:11 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 16:00 +0100
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. markspace <-@.> - 2012-11-04 11:02 -0800
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-11-04 19:56 +0000
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-03 16:46 -0400
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-04 08:22 -0500
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-04 11:30 -0500
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-04 19:40 -0500
Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 16:02 -0700
csiph-web