Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Lew Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: JDBC transaction isolation Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 21 Message-ID: <13727084.5.1336139937187.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcmf4> References: <4fa2aa0c$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4fa2d5c7$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4fa31b83$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4fa3402a$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <755a49a5-0072-4d3b-b310-af8068c28450@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.28.149.29 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1336139937 6497 127.0.0.1 (4 May 2012 13:58:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:58:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <755a49a5-0072-4d3b-b310-af8068c28450@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.28.149.29; posting-account=CP-lKQoAAAAGtB5diOuGlDQk0jIwmH0T User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Received-Bytes: 2157 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14259 Richard Maher wrote: > It's no use simply hiding the fact that someone else has just > completely invalidated your SUM() or COUNT() or any other range > retrievals and validation, updates, and business decisions will now > based on those stale values! It's no use trying to make the case that Oracle's DBMS does not support serializable isolation when it does, especially with wrong reasoning like that. > If Oracle chooses to say they already have "Serializable" then how > 'bout "Really, Really, Bolshie"? (And then maybe a lock promotion on a > sequential table scan?) Huh? What? Whatever Oracle chooses to say, the fact is that their database supports serializable transaction isolation. Your nonsensical babble notwithstanding. -- Lew