From: Eight of Seventeen Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: generics puzzle Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 23:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 40 Message-ID: <01f981c3-bfdc-4beb-aa2d-0db589c5dccc@v15g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> References: <9g2f24Fi0vU1@mid.individual.net> <9gdkrfFn51U3@mid.individual.net> <345c79eb-ffb2-4c4f-84ae-f701a876f818@f11g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <9gn5dcFmomU3@mid.individual.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.54.8.164 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1319610658 28741 127.0.0.1 (26 Oct 2011 06:30:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 06:30:58 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: v15g2000vbm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.54.8.164; posting-account=qcgrhAoAAABQBK1XdZj3k_NQCd0xvkbd User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1,gzip(gfe) Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.chainon-marquant.org!feed.ac-versailles.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!74.125.46.80.MISMATCH!postnews.google.com!v15g2000vbm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:9195 On Oct 25, 3:05=A0am, blm...@myrealbox.com wrote: > In article <345c79eb-ffb2-4c4f-84ae-f701a876f...@f11g2000vbm.googlegroups= .com>, > Eight of Seventeen =A0 wrote: > > On Oct 21, 12:27 pm, blm...@myrealbox.com > > wrote: > > > (You're starting to sound rather familiar, but I don't recognize the > > > name you're using. =A0Have you used another name to post here?) > > > Yes. > > And judging by your response [1] to one of Lew's posts, I think I > know -- well, I'm not sure I'd be able to list all the names you've > used, but it appears that my guess about identity was correct. What does that have to do with Java, screen, vi, or any of the other topics of this thread? > So, tempting though it might be to continue to try to explain > myself, and [insult deleted] No! None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true. > experience [2] suggests that at most two people might actually be > interested in such a discussion, An unsubstantiated claim. > and it might easily expand into something that would annoy other particip= ants. >=A0So I'll try to resist temptation. > > [2] Long-time readers may remember a previous discussion (and [implied in= sult > deleted]). No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at all true.