Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #873
| From | lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Hungarian Notation and Java |
| Date | 2011-07-14 17:30 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <dd997653-1bbf-4f9c-aec1-aa1ef61b699c@r5g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <b4d806bc-4f94-4655-8699-5e1c32e111ed@q1g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <1cwmuo587hrfb.dlg@kimmeringer.de> |
On Jul 14, 9:45 am, Lothar Kimmeringer <news200...@kimmeringer.de> wrote: > Steve wrote: > > Is there any reason left to use Hungarian notation with Java? > > I asked that myself - 10 years ago - and the first time I changed > the type of a variable from int to double I answered it to myself > with a simple: no > > Regards, Lothar > -- > Lothar Kimmeringer E-Mail: spamf...@kimmeringer.de > PGP-encrypted mails preferred (Key-ID: 0x8BC3CD81) > > Always remember: The answer is forty-two, there can only be wrong > questions! Same here, only Java wasn't in the marketplace yet, and I didn't wait to try it to conceive of that scenario. It's a fundamental mistake to name anything in terms of implementation type rather than domain type. For example, a bunch of invoices stored as a 'List<String>' named 'slInvoices' is obscure, uninformative and trenchantly stupid since the 'sl' tells nothing about the role of the variable in the algorithm. A much better name is 'invoices', and it can be a 'List<String>' or 'Set<Invoice>' as the implementation demands. (The latter most likely is better.) The name reflects its purpose, not its irrelevant implementation type. One of the core principles of object-oriented programming is to *hide* implementation. Hungarian notation (as commonly practiced) is the stupid antithesis of that. This is a very, very old debate and the winner was decided a looong time ago. <http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Hungarian+notation+usefulness> -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Hungarian Notation and Java Steve <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 07:46 -0700
Re: Hungarian Notation and Java lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 08:47 -0700
Re: Hungarian Notation and Java markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-13 09:23 -0700
Re: Hungarian Notation and Java Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-07-13 15:33 -0700
Re: Hungarian Notation and Java Lothar Kimmeringer <news200709@kimmeringer.de> - 2011-07-14 18:45 +0200
Re: Hungarian Notation and Java lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 17:30 -0700
Re: Hungarian Notation and Java Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-07-17 22:06 -0700
csiph-web