Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #2061
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? |
| Date | Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:44:47 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <cfnc38tg6la6djo4dh2954sdatk7sfdbha@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <5034c6c8$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <k12vba$mlm$1@dont-email.me> <50351f7d$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Reply-To | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | K2Qzzs3EAqXk5RLzfhxcSw.user.speranza.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 |
| X-Newsreader | Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.help:2061 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:05:41 +0300, Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >Sorry, I don't have a link, I guess it was just my idea. >But I get the point. Javac's warning message is definitive. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it. ~ Max Planck 1858-04-23 1947-10-04
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com> - 2012-08-22 14:47 +0300
Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-08-22 08:45 -0400
Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-08-22 06:31 -0700
Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-22 08:54 -0700
Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? Timothy Madden <terminatorul@gmail.com> - 2012-08-22 21:05 +0300
Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-23 09:44 -0700
Re: Why "Static field should be accessed in a static way" ? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-23 08:58 -0700
csiph-web