Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #1843
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Compiler |
| Date | 2012-06-08 12:27 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <70475a77-eb98-4a33-98bf-24e1174bbe85@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <gqm1t7lvplmq5evodgo9ohna5oqn6gdcgt@4ax.com> <e3c1f6de-3af4-4ab0-b741-62b1e4583251@googlegroups.com> <dgh2t7h5liigqb6td8c438pphnntl0mo48@4ax.com> <jqrihm$1uc$1@dont-email.me> <0o44t7p0feq71m1nnn14vo6v1q55lrn0hl@4ax.com> |
Roedy Green wrote: > markspace wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >> "Is" to me doesn't meant "uses." > > An alternate definition would based around the idea "what is included > with Java?" What can you guarantee is present? The language itself, the java.* packages and the javax.* packages. > On the other paw, strictly speaking none of the libraries are part of > the Java language except things like String and Thread. And all the java.* and javax.* packages. Including things you left out like java.lang.Object, java.lang.Enum, java.io.Serializable, java.io.Externalizable, java.lang.Iterable, java.io.Closeable, ... > There are all kinds of packages you can download free from Oracle that > plug in to Java. Oracle would consider them part of their Java > offering or Java budget. Have you checked that with Oracle? I notice that you you stop short of the claim that Oracle would consider them part of Java itself. > By alternate definitions is JavaMail, JMF, Derby, Javafx ... part of > Java? It is the sort of thing only Oracle could definitively rule on > and would not change the practicalities. No, they aren't. Are they included in the JavaSE compatibility test suite? <http://openjdk.java.net/groups/conformance/docs/JCK6bUsersGuide/html/p7.html> Nope. Q.E.D. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compiler dystokia@stokeontrent.plus.com - 2012-06-04 13:40 +0100
Re: Compiler markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-04 06:23 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-04 07:47 -0700
Re: Compiler dystokia@stokeontrent.plus.com - 2012-06-05 20:06 +0100
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-05 17:33 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-05 18:29 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 09:46 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-05 17:43 -0700
Re: Compiler dystokia@stokeontrent.plus.com - 2012-06-06 16:53 +0100
Re: Compiler Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-06-06 09:56 -0700
Re: Compiler markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-06 12:27 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 10:06 -0700
Re: Compiler "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-usenet2@hjp.at> - 2012-06-07 09:19 +0200
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 09:48 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-07 15:09 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 17:20 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 19:01 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 09:55 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-07 15:06 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-07 17:26 -0700
Re: Compiler markspace <-@.> - 2012-06-07 17:55 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-08 08:05 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-08 12:27 -0700
Re: Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-06-08 21:01 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-06-09 21:30 -0700
Re: Compiler Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-06-04 10:49 -0700
csiph-web