Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #1785

Re: Eclipse And NetBeans

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From Allen l <debare21@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.help
Subject Re: Eclipse And NetBeans
Date Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Organization http://groups.google.com
Lines 187
Message-ID <17103368.1918.1335490738028.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbqq1> (permalink)
References <jmpspb$lph$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host 66.38.22.181
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace posting.google.com 1335490851 15041 127.0.0.1 (27 Apr 2012 01:40:51 GMT)
X-Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:40:51 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To <jmpspb$lph$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.38.22.181; posting-account=aq6liwoAAAD--_fTckdf0GiOP1yItf2b
User-Agent G2/1.0
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.help:1785

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve



On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve



On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve



On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve



On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve



On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve

From what I understand if you are planning to also make Android apps you have to use Eclipse. Netbeans will not work ( I could be wrong)

On Thursday, April 19, 2012 3:35:24 PM UTC-5, Steve wrote:
> I've been using Visual Slickedit for over 10 years.  I'm now working my 
> way through the help files in Eclipse.   I decided to give it a try 
> since it is *almost* a defacto standard in Java shops.
> 
> I've been impressed with what I have seen so far.
> 
> I understand that the other contender for popular, free, plugin based 
> JAVA IDE is NetBeans.
> 
> I understand there may just be religious issues as far as which one a 
> person should choose, but while I understand the differences in 
> philosophies between an older religious war: emacs and vi,  I don't with 
> Eclipse and NetBeans.
> 
> Both are written in Java, both are IDEs, both are built to take in new 
> functionality via plugins.
> 
> So, what are the big differences between the two that make some people 
> go with one and others with the other?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any polite, non-critical, non-negative opinions
> 
> Steve

Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Eclipse And NetBeans Steve <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 16:35 -0400
  Re: Eclipse And NetBeans William Colls <william.colls@rogers.com> - 2012-04-19 17:18 -0400
    Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 17:36 -0700
  Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-04-19 19:42 -0300
    Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Robert Tomsick <robert@tomsick.net> - 2012-04-25 17:09 -0400
      Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-04-26 07:30 -0700
        Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-04-26 18:05 -0300
          Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 15:02 -0700
            Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-04-26 20:00 -0300
              Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 16:31 -0700
                Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-04-27 16:15 -0300
          Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Robert Tomsick <robert@tomsick.net> - 2012-04-27 13:07 -0400
        Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-10 15:28 -0700
        Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-10 15:33 -0700
  Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Allen l <debare21@gmail.com> - 2012-04-26 18:38 -0700
  Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-09 19:11 -0700
    Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Steve <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2012-05-15 09:43 -0400
    Re: Eclipse And NetBeans Steve <tinker123@gmail.com> - 2012-05-15 09:45 -0400

csiph-web