Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #1729 > unrolled thread

Re: Swing Battleship Game

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.gui

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Swing Battleship Game "Brandon McCombs" <brandon.mccombs@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:35 +0000
    Re: Swing Battleship Game "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:35 +0000

#1729 — Re: Swing Battleship Game

  To: comp.lang.java.gui
Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Brandon McCombs wrote:
> 
>> ...Where is *your* code ....
> 
> It was so short, someone of limited attention span might have
> missed it.   But please *try* to pay attention, Brandon.  Your 
> posts are amusing, but they waste bandwidth.
> 

I'd prefer amusing posts over annoying. It's a good thing you cover the 
annoying posts so I can concentrate on the amusing ones.

---
 * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1732

  To: comp.lang.java.gui
Brandon McCombs wrote:
> Andrew Thompson wrote:
>> Brandon McCombs wrote:
>>
>>> ...Where is *your* code ....
>>
>> It was so short, someone of limited attention span might have
>> missed it.   But please *try* to pay attention, Brandon.  Your posts 
>> are amusing, but they waste bandwidth.
>>
> 
> I'd prefer amusing posts over annoying. It's a good thing you cover the 
> annoying posts so I can concentrate on the amusing ones.

I think the point was that Andrew did provide an example, and was responding 
to the direct challenge of "where is *your* code?"  Furthermore, he was making 
the point that the answer is simple and brief, a relevant point to the 
discussion.  I notice that Andrew was not the first to go /ad hominem/ in the 
exchange.

Isn't there a name for the rhetorical device where you challenge someone, then 
make them wrong for responding in kind?  Oh, yeah - flamebaiting, but I was 
sure there was a more formal name for it.

-- 
Lew

---
 * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet!
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.gui

csiph-web