Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!news-xxxfer.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!86597e80!not-for-mail From: "tar" Subject: Re: Collapsible JTable Message-ID: X-Comment-To: comp.lang.java.gui Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.gui In-Reply-To: <710fb178-f127-4e4e-a45c-f9169cbd83fa@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> References: <710fb178-f127-4e4e-a45c-f9169cbd83fa@n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=IBM437 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gateway: time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92] Lines: 28 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:51:09 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.60.20.240 X-Complaints-To: news@tds.net X-Trace: newsreading01.news.tds.net 1303919469 96.60.20.240 (Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:51:09 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:51:09 CDT Organization: TDS.net Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.gui:4540 To: comp.lang.java.gui Todd writes: > The details make it even more asinine. Re-verification (which is the > case since we already have a version of NetBeans) must be done if > there is a change in the version number to the left of the last > decimal point in the version number. > > So, since the last NetBeans version we had installed was 6.0.1, the > "new" version of 6.5 has a change to the left of the 1. Now, if the > version we were using was 6.0 (without the .1), then there would be no > review needed for 6.5, since the 6 did not change. How is that for > being as close to arbitrary as is possible while still maintaining > some twisted sense of reason? Hmmm. I don't suppose you could downgrade to a plain version 6.0 and then upgrade from that to 6.5? Oh well, there doesn't seem to be a plain old version 6.0 available for download. -- Thomas A. Russ, USC/Information Sciences Institute --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24